Q Overview In this activity, you will have the opportunity to examine how using critical analysis tools influences your interactions with others. You will also consider how the analysis of your topic might have turned out differently if you looked at it through a different lens. Completing this activity will result in a draft of the reflection section of your project. It also provides an opportunity to obtain valuable feedback from your instructor that you can incorporate into your project submission. Directions In this activity, you will work on the second part of the reflection section of your project. You should consider the feedback from your instructor on the previous activities to inform this assignment. Include diverse perspectives from varied sources to support your points. Look to the SNHU Shapiro Library for assistance and consider the sources you have used thus far to support your research. First, you will explain how the analysis of your topic in wellness may have been different if you had used one of the other general education lenses. Then you will explain how critically analyzing wellness affects your interactions with various people. You are not required to address each item below the rubric criteria, but you may use them to better understand the criteria and guide your thinking and writing. Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria: 1. Integrate reliable evidence from varied sources throughout your paper to support your analysis. A. It is important to draw from a more diverse pool of perspectives from varied sources to support the analysis. This is different from the Citations and Attributions rubric criterion. B. Reliable evidence from varied sources should be interwoven throughout the paper itself, while citing and attributing sources will be represented as APA in-text citations and a reference list at the end of your work. C. You will be evaluated on both criteria. 2. Explain at least one way in which your analysis might have been different if you had used one of the other general education lenses to analyze your topic. A. This should be a brief (3–5 sentences) reflection about how using the language and perspective from a different lens would shift your view of your topic. 3. Explain how analyzing wellness can help interactions with people with a different viewpoints, cultures, or perspectives. A. Think about ways in which a greater awareness of wellness strengthens individual conversations. Consider including an example from your life. What to Submit Submit your short paper as a 1- to 2-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style. Consult the Shapiro Library APA Style Guide for more information on citations. Module Six Activity Rubric Criteria Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value Reliable Evidence From Varied Sources Integrates reliable evidence from varied sources throughout the paper to support analysis Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include drawing from a more diverse pool of perspectives, using more varied sources to support the analysis, or integrating evidence and sources throughout the paper to support the analysis Does not attempt criterion 30 Different General Education Lens Explains at least one way in which the analysis might have been different if another general education lens was used to analyze the topic Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include the use of an alternative general education lens, a clearer explanation of how the analysis might have been different if one of the other general education lenses had been used to analyze the topic, or more support for the explanation Does not attempt criterion 30 Interactions Explains how analyzing wellness can help interactions with people with different viewpoint, culture, or perspective Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include connecting the value of critical analysis to interactions with people with a different viewpoint, culture, or perspective or providing a more thorough explanation of how the analysis can help these interactions Does not attempt criterion 30 Articulation of Response Clearly conveys meaning with correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, demonstrating an understanding of audience and purpose Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, negatively impacting readability Submission has critical errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, preventing understanding of ideas 5 Citations and Attributions Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with consistent minor errors Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errors Does not use citations for ideas requiring attribution 5 Total: 100%